Of course, I'm voting for Obama.
I like to think that it's because I am an educated, enlightened voter, up on the issues, in touch with what candidate best reflects my views. That, frankly, is why I voted for Kucinich in the primaries. He may be a bit of a nut job, but he best represents my political views. He was one of the few brave ones to come out in favor of gay marriage, which to me is a simple case of equal human rights. No more, no less. The notion that Obama feels he mustn't endorse gay marriage in order to be elected, even though he privately favors it is, to me, sad. And if he really opposes gay marriage, then I might have to vote for Nader.
Most conservatives, I believe, oppose gay marriage because they think gay people, and the idea of gay sex, is alien and disgusting. But they use the bible as a crutch to explain why -- the Bible says it is an abomination! But if you ever meet one of those people, don't let them get away with it. That quote is in Leviticus. Make them turn the other parts of Leviticus, where it says it's OK to sell your daughter into slavery, that working on the Sabbath merits stoning, and even prohibits hair trimming. In fact, any time anybody quotes the Bible to you, tell them to take their good book and shove it, since it's full of little-referenced ridiculous stuff that makes the common stuff preachers always quote completely invalid.
But enough about that (for now). Whew.
I find myself wondering how anybody could support McCain. Of course, I admire and revere his service to our country in Vietnam. And to a large extent he used to be a fairly centrist Republican senator, although still much too conservative for me. Better than most, I suppose. These days, though, I think he is a pretty lousy candidate for President; it's a sign of how conservative the country is that Obama isn't ahead by more.
Two things bug me about McCain, and they aren't news. First, his "I'm going to drop everything, suspend my campaign, and head to Washington to fix the economic crisis" gambit. Well he did head to Washington, but he didn't really suspend his campaign, still running commercials and letting surrogates represent him on the stump. And it turned out he didn't really have much to say when he got to Washington. So the whole thing was an empty political song-and-dance. How could anyone in the country not see through that?
Then of course there's Sarah Palin. McCain's signs say "Country First" but that is completely put to the lie by Sarah Palin. Is there anyone in the universe who thinks Sarah Palin is the best conservative to put second in line for the White House? Yes, admittedly, lots of other candidates have chosen running mates primarily to help their ticket. But they've always chosen from a pool of experienced, qualified people. (Of course I exclude Dan Quayle, but at least he'd been in the Senate for a while.) McCain met with Bible Spice (Alex Baldwin's term, not mine) for a few hours and made his incredibly cynical pick.
Now you may argue that Obama isn't much more experienced. That may or may not be true. But Obama was chosen as the Democratic nominee by millions of Democratic voters who want him as President. On election day, you can cast your vote as to whether you think their judgment was right. But Sarah Palin was chosen by only one man -- McCain. And that choice is a direct reflection on his judgement, what kind of judgement he'd have as President. And he failed.
Who could possibly disagree that McCain is a terrible candidate? I mean, you may be desperate to roll back Roe v. Wade, promote the teaching of creationism, and a whole host of other conservative agenda items. But this guy? Does 45% of America really think this guy would make a good President? I really have been struggling over the past weeks to believe that.
Then I realized how most people view elections. They view them like sporting events.
Most people have a team they root for no matter what. I admit I root for the Red Sox no matter who is on the team. It's because I grew up near Boston, and that's that. I mean, I like a lot of the players, especially Mike Lowell, who took less money to stay in Boston. (And now of course he might be traded. He was an idiot for not asking for a no-trade clause in return for taking less money.) But I root for them even though I don't like a few players: Manny, I came to believe long before he left for warmer SoCal climes, is a dick. But even though Manny is a dick, I would never start rooting for the Twins or the Rangers. And certainly not for the perennial cellar-dwellers the Pirates.
So, like their sports team affiliations, most people form their political views in early adulthood and stick to them forever, no matter what. So it doesn't matter if Bush Sr. picks Dan Quayle as his running mate, it doesn't matter if Reagan broke laws to arm the contras, it doesn't matter if Bush Jr. is an anti-science zealot. People who consider themselves Republicans are going to support their team, no matter what.